Are PAT Label Printers Worth It?


Metrel PAT label printer

We occasionally get asked which PAT testers can print labels. Manufacturers such as Fluke, Megger, Metrel and Seaward offer compatible printers for some of their downloadable testers, but a label printer isn’t always the best option. Before you spend the money, it’s worth thinking through total cost, durability, and whether it will actually speed you up on site.


What to Check Before You Buy

  • Compatibility – confirm your tester model supports the printer (and whether it needs specific software or firmware).
  • Label type – direct thermal labels can fade; thermal transfer labels are usually more durable.
  • Label size and format – check you can print the information you need (asset ID, retest date, site name, pass/fail, barcode/QR if used).
  • Consumables cost – label rolls, ribbons, batteries and how many labels you get per roll.
  • Battery and charging – will it last a full day on site and can it be charged easily in a van or at a desk?
  • Software workflow – does your process rely on downloading results, using an app, or printing from a PC afterwards?
  • Barcodes / scanners – if you’re building an asset register, barcoded labels can save time and reduce data entry errors.

1) Cost: Printer + Consumables

PAT label printers are a significant extra expense. Depending on model and bundle, you may be looking at hundreds of pounds for the printer alone, and then ongoing consumable costs for labels (and sometimes ribbons). Label stock cost can add up quickly over a year of testing.


By comparison, pre-printed labels are usually much cheaper per label, especially when bought in quantity. For many testers and contractors, pre-printed labels are the most cost-effective option.

2) Durability: Direct Thermal vs Thermal Transfer

Not all printed labels last the same length of time. Some printers use direct thermal labels. These can be cheaper, but like parking tickets left in sunlight, the print can fade with heat and UV, making labels hard to read later.


Thermal transfer printers (using a ribbon to print onto synthetic label stock) are generally a better choice where durability matters. The labels are usually more resistant to moisture, abrasion and sunlight — but the consumables cost more.

3) Convenience and Speed

Label printers can feel like a productivity upgrade, but they don’t always speed up real-world testing. Many experienced PAT technicians apply a pre-printed label while the tester is still running the test sequence. With printing, you typically have to:

  • complete the test
  • save the record
  • wait for the printer to receive the data
  • wait for the label to print

Even if printing only adds 20–30 seconds per item, across a busy day it can be a meaningful delay. If you’re testing large volumes (and trying to remain competitive), that time matters.

4) Practicality on Site

If you’re moving room-to-room (or desk-to-desk) in offices, schools or commercial sites, carrying a printer can be inconvenient. Wired printers add another cable to manage, and wireless printers are usually better — but they can still get in the way when you’re working under desks, around cable trays, or in cramped areas.

Who Benefits Most From Label Printing?

PAT contractors: In a competitive market, the extra equipment cost and time per item often makes printing hard to justify unless a client specifically requests printed asset labels or barcoded workflows.

In-house testing: Printing can make more sense for facilities teams doing their own PAT testing, especially where you want labels tied neatly to your records and you’re not under the same time pressures as a contractor.

Alternatives Worth Considering

  • Pre-printed inspection labels (fastest and cheapest for most people)
  • Pre-printed barcoded asset labels (useful if you want quicker identification and better records)
  • Software-first workflow (record everything properly, then label in batches if needed)

Labels and Records

Whatever label method you use, the important part is that labels link clearly to your records (for example via an asset number). Good records make it easier to prove due diligence, spot repeat failures, and review test frequency. If you’re responsible for managing a workplace system (rather than just doing the testing), see our guide to Managing PAT Testing in the Workplace.

Training and Getting Started

If you’re looking to carry out PAT testing within your own organisation, we regularly run a PAT Competent Person course covering correct test selection, inspection technique and practical testing.